2018-03-05 | Technology | Stupid Tricks
Twitter is fascinating. On one hand, you have an endless stream of self-curated news that can be incredibly informative for both work and play. On the other hand, there’s abuse, harassment, and “fake news.” It’s quite fascinating to have easy access to the best and worst of humanity, in real time, and without moving an inch.
So what’s an arm-chair sociologist with programming chops to do on a long weekend, like last year’s 4th of July? Write some code to show him what tweet from a given account was retweeted the most? Nah, that’s way too geeky. Dude should be out in nature, or watching his neighbors light off fireworks in the middle of the infamous Haight Street right in front of a bar called Molotov’s.
Oh wait. No, I did exactly that.
At the time, I was fascinated by the @congressedits twitter account. For those that aren’t familiar, that’s a bot account that tweets out any anonymous Wikipedia edit that comes from a US congress IP address. Most edits traditionally were about the various congresspeople, their districts, and so on and so forth. Most were boring. Here’s an example:
United States Senate Finance Subcommittee on Health Care Wikipedia article edited anonymously from US Senate https://t.co/BX0oUk2WvN
— congress-edits (@congressedits) February 7, 2017
But occasionally, a “juicy” edit would happen, whether it was a politically motivated edit:
List of countries by external debt Wikipedia article edited anonymously from US House of Representatives https://t.co/lhEGH4DHX4
— congress-edits (@congressedits) August 28, 2016
or just a bizarre article coming from Congress like:
Almost Famous Wikipedia article edited anonymously from US House of Representatives https://t.co/9VNJ1dzA7g
— congress-edits (@congressedits) August 21, 2015
or
Jaguar XJ (X350) Wikipedia article edited anonymously from US House of Representatives https://t.co/l50cQe8P7T
— congress-edits (@congressedits) September 1, 2015
In all cases, the retweet count would vary based on its entertainment value or political malice. So I got curious about what got retweeted the most. I wrote some python code to talk to the Twitter REST API, badda boom, badda bing, I got the results.
At the time, the most retweeted edit was
Obstruction of justice Wikipedia article edited anonymously from US House of Representatives https://t.co/hUxWbKTpa4
— congress-edits (@congressedits) June 8, 2017
where someone had added Donald Trump to the list of obstruction cases. This was followed closely by a discussion on Garfield the cat’s gender identity.
Garfield Wikipedia article edited anonymously from US House of Representatives https://t.co/wkB0u543S5
— congress-edits (@congressedits) March 1, 2017
Alas, all good thing had to come to an end. At some point, a Hill staffer decided to troll the account and started making random edits from various offices to extremely odd pages like:
They Will Kill Us All (Without Mercy) Wikipedia article edited anonymously from US House of Representatives https://t.co/wBgCNgqR3F
— congress-edits (@congressedits) October 23, 2017
and
Carly Rae Jepsen Wikipedia article edited anonymously from US House of Representatives https://t.co/JKDTT6k7RC
— congress-edits (@congressedits) September 13, 2017
And so now, the most retweeted @congressedits tweet is:
Tom Nook Wikipedia article edited anonymously from US House of Representatives https://t.co/znMGD92sxC pic.twitter.com/NMa1VIGLtG
— congress-edits (@congressedits) November 21, 2017
But that’s not what I’ll leave you with to ponder the most. Our president is, of course, a huge tweeter. What’s his most retweeted tweet?
#FraudNewsCNN #FNN pic.twitter.com/WYUnHjjUjg
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 2, 2017
Click through, watch the video, and ponder the implications.